Get data before spending up on home energy infrastructure

Published by

WattWatchers
I really, really want to get battery storage at my place. It will complete what I started 18 months ago when I had a 10kW solar PV system installed on my rooftop. On-site storage will allow me to maximise use of the clean energy my home generates from the sun on site, and minimise any export to the main electricity grid. Also, anyone who knows me will confirm that I am a total geek for this stuff.
So why the hesitation?
Firstly, cost. I can do the mathematics and if I rush in now and pay market rates for a good quality battery system for my home it could take 10, even 15 years to recover my investment (that’s a financially daunting equation when you consider that the actual life of the battery system may only be about 10 years). I could even live with that and enjoy being an early-mover, like the pioneering Prius drivers in the early 2000s, but there’s something else nagging at me.
Secondly, the hype. Frankly I am part suspicious part alarmed. The sheer amount of paid for promotion and free media coverage that battery storage technologies are attracting in 2016 is one warning sign. More machiavellian, I am thinking, is the enthusiasm being shown for battery storage by some of the biggest traditional energy utility players. If big utilities are in the cheer squad and underwriting the costs for high-profile trials, then I’m not sure batteries are a club that I or any home energy consumer should be rushing to join. At least not until some of the fog clears.
We risk wasting an absolutely fabulous digital disruption of the energy sector if at the end we emerge with utilities still firmly in control and consumers still relatively powerless. The reverse should be true, with the new energy revolution empowering consumers with access to accurate real-time data about the energy cycle in their homes, and consequently breaking down the information asymmetry that currently allows utilities to dominate. Look no further than quarterly or at best monthly bills when better, faster data could allow consumers to pay daily, weekly, or however they liked.
Yet still I’m so, so tempted to press ahead and install batteries. Maybe just a 10kWh system first up, which is about half of the 20kWh of storage capacity I’ll most likely need to optimise the on-site use of my home solar generation and minimise any draw down from the main grid in expensive peak pricing periods. I have a way-above-average handle on the storage capacity I’ll need because unlike most people, I have fantastic data from my Wattwatchers devices on how, and how much energy is generated from solar, imported from and exported to the grid, and consumed within my family’s home (see image below – even my stove and pool system re being monitored via dashboard partner Solar Analytics).
My greener heart is saying ‘just do it Gavin’. But my more financially pragmatic head is saying hang off, and my public conscience is urging me to reinforce for others why they also should take a pause before jumping on board the storage rollercoaster. Especially because nothing is more certain than storage pricing coming down, most likely very substantially by 2020 if not beforehand. The best battery chemistries will rise to the top through real-market testing, poor performers will be weeded out in a Darwinian process, and uptake volume will drive down the cost of producing this very engineered technology solution.
I think my own experience in the past year is worthy of attention. I have been personally and professionally focused on saving energy for over a decade. When I put solar on my roof and installed energy saving kit in my new-build house such as LED lights with very smart remotely-controllable Belkin Wemo switches, I thought I’d kill my utility bill.
Then I started receiving $1500 quarterly bills and realised that more work needed to be done. By using the real-time data from Wattwatchers and Solar Analytics for sophisticated solar performance monitoring, and another partner Grid Analytics for broader energy management – I’ve been able to shift some major daytime loads within the home to match the normal daily solar generation curve. That saves money straight off because any solar used within the home is worth a lot more than I’d get for exporting it to the grid day-to-day. Along with some additional energy-saving behaviour changes, I pushed our bill down towards $800 a quarter.
Next I sourced a new, more progressive energy retailer, Mojo Power, which I figure will save me a further $150-$200 a quarter. If I do end up with battery storage, whatever my apprehensions, the capacity I’ll need and the spend involved will be a lot less because I took the time to understand how energy is generated and used in my home, then took steps to reconfigure time of use, then paid attention to energy saving, then bought better, and only after all that invested in home storage.
FOOTNOTE: My buy-better strategy in switching to Mojo Power looks to be working well. For the first time in as long as I can remember, my family’s power bills are coming in under $600 a quarter. The next problem is that everyone’s power bills are set to jump again this July.

 
Gavin Dietz is Managing Director of Sydney-based energy technology company Wattwatchers. He’s a keen technologist and home automation innovator who has spent over 25 years working in a variety of roles focused on consumer-facing, enterprise-grade, globally-applicable technology solutions. In the energy technology sector.
Source: WattWatchers. Reproduced with permission.

This post was published on May 4, 2017 12:13 pm

View Comments

  • $1,500 per quarter with a 10kW solar system? Are you running a data centre at your house (given what you do, I'm not being sarcastic) or do you have ten kids, or is your pool electrically heated all-year round along with a spa, or is it a small apartment complex?
    I appreciate you've gotten it down to $600 per quarter, but that just feels like very high electricity usage to begin with, especially given your lighting is all LED already.

    • Even $600 seems to be rather high for someone been aware of their consumption. The above graphs indicate a daily consumption of less than 4kwh which at a typical rate of 26c/kWh is only around $80 a quarter plus supply charge which at the moment is around $130 or so a quarter.

  • The pool pump shows a usage of 22kWh per day. Switching to an energy efficient low RPM model for around $2500 would save two thirds of 22kWh per day (it seems to be a big pump at 2.6kW).
    Don't tell me that the director of Wattwatchers doesn't get that simple fact. Or was it just a promotional piece of advertising?

      • 8.5 hours runtime times 2.6kW = 22.1 kWh/day. The 2.6kW for the pool pump shows in the first graph.
        I can't read the second graph in detail. It could be 20kWh per day equals 7.7 hours pool runtime.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Solar Insiders Podcast: A roller coaster year in review – and the keys to a smoother 2025

In our final episode for the year, SunWiz's Warwick Johnston on the highs and the…

December 20, 2024

“Nightmare:” Energy tariffs that are blowing out bills, blindsiding consumers

Regulator report finds that little-understood but increasingly common demand tariffs can add up to $800…

December 20, 2024

Hidden cost of rooftop solar? Actually, networks spend next to nothing on managing exports

Have you heard the one about non-solar homes paying the cost to networks of accommodating…

December 19, 2024

With just $500 of rooftop solar modules, you could charge your EVs for 20 years

Four good quality solar panels - costing around $500 - would produce enough power for…

December 19, 2024

“It makes no sense:” How fossil gas industry is blocking electrification and consumer savings

The gas war still burns: “We need to think about how to stop misinformation going…

December 17, 2024

SwitchedOn Podcast: Pathway to electrification being blocked by fossil gas

IEEFA's Amandine Denis-Ryan explains why new gas supplies are not needed in the long term,…

December 16, 2024