Energex’ recent submission to the Queensland Productivity Commission electricity pricing inquiry left a lot of solar system owners concerned about their systems and their plans to add batteries at a later stage.
Energex recently increased their supply charge from 91c/day to $1.28/day. The Off Peak Tariff and Night rate tariff are also to go up. The latest addition to this is a proposal to remove the 44ct feed-in tariff 265,000 solar system owners in Queensland have been enjoying if they add batteries to their existing system.
This proposal in particular has upset many system owners because it appears it directly targets those who try to make the most of their renewable energy without causing further harm to Energex’ network (or the planet). Energex’ concern is twofold:
We are not the only ones who are concerned. Solar Citizens, a consumer advocated group has the same understanding of Energex’ proposal.
Whilst we don’t support the idea of charging the batteries at an offpeak rate and then selling it back at 44ct (it is against current regulations) we do obviously support storing solar energy in batteries for use at a later time.
We believe that proposals like these are more likely to come up over the next few months and years as utilities across the country come to terms with storage systems on their networks. Most experts now agree that the networks have been “overbuilt” and this is a key reason why we’re seeing such drastic proposals from utilities as they’re seeing their income stream disappear.
Given the state of flux the utilities are in currently and most likely will be for several years, purchasing a storage system comes with some risks. We advise our customers to consider reducing that risk by taking part of their home offgrid while leaving some of it connected. This means you can keep your 44ct feed in tariff, install batteries (completely separately from the existing system) and by taking part of your home offgrid you’re taking the first steps towards true independence.
Over the past 2 weeks we’ve received a number of questions from consumers relating to this.
I’d like to share those and our answers:
Energex argues the increased ability to keep large amounts of power for release back into the network would give those solar householders on the top rate an unfair advantage which was never intended by the bonus scheme?
Ergon does not call for eligibility to be removed in its submission, but argues that generous government rebates and feed-in tariffs have shifted the mindset of many customers from an environmental motivation to seeking a financial return. Am I not allowed to make the most of my feed-in tariff?
Tom Kuiper is wholesaling manager for Giant Power.
This post was published on January 13, 2016 2:39 pm
Switching water heaters to charge during the day can soak up solar and make sure…
Australia has notched up a new renewable energy milestone, with the number of households around…
A client recently presented us with a challenge: More than 2,000 properties that could have…
A $15m large-scale solar and battery storage rollout across six regional Western Australia towns has…
Australians aren’t signing up to VPPs at the rate the government needs to meet its…
Clean Energy Finance Corporation signs agreement with ING Australia to deliver another low-rate green loan…
View Comments
Putting in Battery Storage in Qld when on the 44 c Feed-in Tariff just does not make any economical sense - you are effectively using the Grid to store your excess daily energy. The Numbers never make it viable. It is a different situation at 6 or 8 cents feed-in tariff - and currently batteries are accepted for storage on this scenario.
So I don't really see what is causing all the complaints - just seems like newspapers reporting what will cause the most alarm!
One advantage of battery storage is that current systems are in Queensland are limited to export 5kVA. if you have 6kW of installed solar panels you can store the excess capacity in the middle of the day and reuse when the solar production falls below 5kVA. Please note that the straight return on investment for this setup still marginal.
Thanks for the article, Tom but, speaking as an engineer and a "Defender of Australian English", *please* won't you abbreviate cents as "c", not "ct" (which is the abbreviation for caret (i.e. diamond size). Also the kWh is so called as it is named in honour ofthe inventor of the steam engine, a James Watt. Hence kWh with the capital W in his honour. (Good for your credibility to get units accurate, too! ;)
There is no such thing as "Australian English". Only English. Any variation is just butchered English.