Tesla battery + solar now “significantly cheaper” than grid power

Published by
Bruce Mountain
February 21, 2018 10:09 am

RenewEconomy
In November 2016, our analysis shows that a Tesla Powerwall and a 5kW rooftop solar system could deliver electricity around the same price as grid power. Our latest estimate shows solar and storage is now significantly cheaper.

In late 2016 Tesla launched the Powerwall 2, halving the price of storage relative to Powerwall 1.
In a note in November 2016 we analysed the economics of one of these batteries plus 5kW of rooftop solar plus grid for back-up and exports, relative to grid-only supply for a household with north facing roof in Adelaide that consumes 4800 kWh per year.
The comparison worked out the annual bill with and without PV and battery.

We assumed a 10 year battery life, 20 year PV life with no residual for either and assuming the household financed it with a household mortgage.
For grid offers we took the average of all 76 market offers from the 14 retailers making offers in the market, assuming in the first case that all discounts in those offers were achieved and in the second case assuming only that the unconditional discounts were achieved.
The results of the analysis are shown in Chart 1 below, which shows that for these assumptions, households are typically better off installing 5 kW solar and a battery rather than relying on grid only supply.
Chart 1: Tesla Powerwall 2 plus 5 kV PV plus grid versus grid-only in Adelaide in November 2016
Since that time many other battery suppliers have come to the market (Global-Roam’s Battery Finder website now counts 203 different residential battery systems for sale in Australia).

The Climate Council estimates that there were 20,000 home battery installations in 2017, more than triple the 6,750 new installations in 2016.
And a couple of weeks ago the South Australian Government announced a policy to install 50,000 Tesla Powerwall 2’s plus 5 kW PV in a deal that would involve the government owning the assets but the households involved paying 27 cents per kWh for the electricity.
This notes looks again at the economics using the latest information on prices.

For a start, on the same basis (average of all market offers) the average price (for a 4800 kWh per year customer) in the 72 markets offers from the 16 retailers in the market today is 42.4 cents per kWh (assuming all discounts achieved ) or 46.4 cents (assuming only conditional discounts achieved).
This is 12.5% higher than the average prices calculated in the same way in November 2016.
Tesla now estimates a higher installed price of their Powerwall 2 ($11,075 versus $10,300) taking the mid-point of the installed price they quote on their website now compared to November 2016.
The price of 5kW PV has however fallen considerably from $7,318 to $5,500 (taking the average price quoted on solarchoice.com.au then and now).
And PV feed-in rates have more than doubled from around 6.8 cents per kWh in November 2016 to typically around 16 cents per kWh now).
Bringing this information together and using the same analysis that we used in November 2016 we get the results in Chart 2 below.
Chart 2: Tesla Powerwall 2 plus 5 kV PV plus grid versus grid-only in Adelaide in February 2018
The combination of 5 kW PV plus Tesla Powerwall 2 plus grid is now significantly cheaper than the average price achieved from grid-only supply even if all the discounts in the grid offers are assumed to be met.
The difference between Chart 1 and Chart 2, over just 14 months, is remarkable. The writing was on the wall for grid-only supply 14 months ago and while we expected the gap between grid only and PV+battery+grid would grow larger, this is happening more quickly than we imagined.
South Australia’s consumers bought 20% less electricity from the grid in 2017 than they did in 2010. I imagine that by 2025 the amount will be at least 20% less again.

Bruce Mountain is director of CME

This post was published on February 21, 2018 10:09 am

View Comments

  • It would be more complete to include a solar+grid option in the comparison. With the reduced cost of solar and increases in feed in tariffs then this may in fact still be the cheapest option for customers.

  • The PV is giving all the savings, adding a Powerwall just makes the payback worse. The grid makes the best "virtual battery", I get 15c FIT during the day, and charge my 2 EV at 13c overnight. The cost of my "virtual battery" is -2c, ie I make money using the grid to store my solar PV. It makes no financial sense to install a Powerwall except for power during power outages.

Leave a Comment
Share
Published by
Bruce Mountain
February 21, 2018 10:09 am

Related Post

Recent Posts

Unemployment is one of the strongest factors driving rooftop solar

New research shows postcodes with higher rates of unemployed have higher rates of rooftop solar,…

November 21, 2024

Solar Insiders Podcast: Four million and counting – the race to make the PV puzzle pieces fit

UNSW's Baran Yildiz on how Australia's millions of rooftop solar systems and other consumer energy…

November 21, 2024

Flow Power enters home retail market offering big benefits from small behavioural changes

Flow Power is branching into the residential market with a "technology integrated" electricity plan –…

November 20, 2024

SwitchedOn Podcast: Why the jobless are also turning to solar PV

New data shows unemployed people are also turning to rooftop solar to have certainty about…

November 20, 2024

Solar battery surge expected for plugged-in households seeking to cut costs

More households expected to investigate solar batteries as a way to save on the cost…

November 18, 2024

If hot water ran off daytime solar, we could slash emissions and tame the solar duck

Switching water heaters to charge during the day can soak up solar and make sure…

November 15, 2024