Greens leader Greg Barber goes solar + Tesla storage to sidestep perverse energy markets

Published by

Just over a month after the first shipment of US-made Tesla Powerwalls arrived on Australian shores, the Melbourne home of Victorian Greens leader Greg Barber has become the first in the state to install the 7kWh battery.

Barber with his newly installed Tesla Powerwall battery

The Powerwall – Elon Musk’s take on residential battery storage that effectively put a rocket under the global market – was installed by Natural Solar at Barber’s Brunswick West home, alongside a new 5kW solar system, complete with inverter and in-built energy management software.
And it’s all part of Barber’s plan to side-step Victoria’s “perverse” energy markets.
In an interview with One Step Off The Grid on Wednesday, Barber said the low – and still falling – cost of solar PV meant that it was now a clear winner for Australian households wanting to generate low-cost, clean electricity.
“Panels are so cheap now that we just ordered as much as we could fit onto out roof,” he said – but the “lousy price” for solar electricity exported back to the grid meant having solar didn’t make sense for many households, unless they added storage.
“I’m feeding (electricity) into the grid at 5c/kWh and taking it back out of the grid at 25c/kWh,” Barber told One Step. “I can make it on my roof cheaper than they can deliver it. But unfortunately I can’t throw an electricity cord over the back fence and sell my solar to my neighbour.”
The Barber household – which he says has already done all of the “cheap stuff” to maximise the efficient use of energy – uses between 6-12kWh of electricity a day. The solar system, meanwhile, has so far generated as much as 22kWh in one day.
“We’re frugal users, so without a battery we’d be exporting a huge amount – 10kWh – back to the grid. And we would have been importing 7kWh in the evenings, but – provided we don’t go whoopee –  the battery will take care of that.”
Still, he adds, “because of the lousy prices for exported electrons, we’ll be looking at other forms of storage, too; storing energy as cold air, or hot water, or in an EV further on down the line.”
As the system stands, however, Barber says he thinks he’s got the right size to make it NPV (net present value) positive, and is expecting to pay it off in 15 years.
“But that’s looking at the system stand alone,” he adds. “I have other revenue streams. If I reduce my gas consumption or get rid of gas, that contributes to my revenue.
And that will be Barber’s next move – to get off fossil fuel gas, for which the fixed-price cost alone is 70 cents a day. This would mean replacing the instant hot water system, perhaps with a heat pump, solar hot water or electric storage.
But switching to solar plus storage was the obvious first step.
“The rules as they operate in the Victorian energy market are perverse. They drive you – they drive you to install your own energy management system.”
Indeed, the effect of this “drive” to solar and battery storage could soon be writ large in Victoria, and many other states around Australia, when tens of thousands of households come off a 25c/kWh feed-in tariff – a sort of “one-for-one” tariff, says Barber, that plus or minus the benefit solar offers the grid, could be considered a reasonable market return.
On this point, Barber is clear: “changing the solar tariff is not about fairness… and it’s not about incentivising solar, because we don’t need to. It’s about re-introducing some rationality into the electricity market.”

This post was published on March 2, 2016 12:22 pm

View Comments

  • Narratives of individual experiences like this appear on this site and others from time to time and make for interesting reading. We learn how different people think and how they address their issues. But underpinning all these stories is the concession that we are not doing anything to address the real problem which is the continued use of coal to produce our electricity.
    It is similar to all that advice about using LED lamps to reduce emissions. Surely the best way to reduce emissions is to replace coal with renewables.
    Somehow, we can't challenge the big polluters.
    I suspect it has to do with the reality that this nation's exports depend mostly on fossil fuels and dealing with climate change will interfere with the profitability of our export trade.
    Both major political parties have shown no interest in dealing with this problem. They talk, but there is no action.
    Sadly we have no information as to the extent to which political donations have a role in this sad outcome.

  • How does this sound? Your home is 100% electric. No fossil fuels ( eg: gas ). You have a solar system with battery storage that generates and stores enough energy to power your home and fully charge your EV on any day of the year, even in winter. Consequently you have no need to be connected to the grid. Mmmmmmm. "The Great Energy Transition" is on its way! Pity our politicians are brain dead.

  • Buying a battery for green reasons makes very little sense in 2016. The power stored in a battery is much more CO2 intensive than the power you export which is immediately offsetting the filthy Victorian grid. The Powerwall would be responsible for approx 3,000kWh of energy input in the mining and manufacture of the battery. I wonder if the 100kg battery was air freighted too?

    • So would it pay for itself in kWh terms in roughly 500-600 days?
      Out of interest: what is the carbon cost of a solar panel?

  • Apart from the unsupported claims that batteries are 'green', they really don't make financial sense. Forget about calculating $/kwh costs.
    There is always a connection charge, yet nobody seems to calculate that in terms of $/kwh - it costs the same if energy is used or not. The battery is the same. It costs a fixed amount each day, used or not.
    If the Powerwall could be purchased alone for $9,500, that's $2.60/day
    over the 10 year warranty of the battery.
    From the numbers given in the article, the maximum grid cost appears to be 12kWh@0.25 = $3.00. That cost is clear. Pay for what you use.
    Doing nothing at all, comes close to the battery cost alone, but the battery also needs to be fed energy, an inverter, controllers and panels.

    • Except the PowerWall will probably last a lot longer than the 10 year warranty. Lets say 20 years? That reduces the payback considerably. Tesla are talking about 10,000,000 miles for their car batteries... I'm sure that will soon relate to PowerWalls as well...

Recent Posts

If hot water ran off daytime solar, we could slash emissions and tame the solar duck

Switching water heaters to charge during the day can soak up solar and make sure…

November 15, 2024

Rooftop solar: Australia celebrates “momentous” milestone as 4 million households tap cheapest power

Australia has notched up a new renewable energy milestone, with the number of households around…

November 14, 2024

Rooftop solar almost always pays off – but what happens when you add batteries?

A client recently presented us with a challenge: More than 2,000 properties that could have…

November 14, 2024

Solar and battery microgrids slash diesel and dollars in six remote towns

A $15m large-scale solar and battery storage rollout across six regional Western Australia towns has…

November 13, 2024

Virtual power plants will fail without an industry overhaul that puts consumers first

Australians aren’t signing up to VPPs at the rate the government needs to meet its…

November 13, 2024

CEFC to back new green loans program to support household solar, batteries and upgrades

Clean Energy Finance Corporation signs agreement with ING Australia to deliver another low-rate green loan…

November 13, 2024