Categories: Solar

Lord Howe microgrid in doubt as Frydenberg rules out wind turbines

Published by

Plans to install a hybrid renewable energy plus battery storage microgrid at New South Wales’ Lord Howe Island, and slash its diesel fuel use, have hit a major political snag, after the federal energy minister intervened to rule out the wind power component of the long-awaited, ARENA-backed project.

The project – which has been in the works for some six years now, and in 2014 won a $4.5 million grant from the Australian Renewable Energy Agency and a $5.6 million loan from NSW Treasury – was to install 500kW of wind, 400kW solar PV and 400kWh of battery storage, in an effort to cut the island’s diesel usage by two-thirds.
Just one year ago the Lord Howe Island Board called for tenders for the installation of the first stage of the project’s development.
But the Board’s manager of infrastructure and engineering services, Andrew Logan, said Minister Frydenberg had ruled, late last week, that the impacts of the proposed two 250kW wind turbines on the Island’s World and National Heritage values – particularly on its ‘visual landscape’ – were unacceptable.
The “very, very disappointing decision,” he said, meant that the wind turbine component of the project would “not proceed in its current form,” while the rest of the project – slated for completion later this year – might not proceed at all.
“We’ll have to go back to the drawing board to some extent,” Logan told One Step Off The Grid on Tuesday, “because we have a grant from ARENA based on the wind, solar and battery.”
Logan noted that feasibility studies conducted by consulting group Jacobs had found that a combination of solar, battery and wind was going to achieve a 70 per cent reduction in the island’s diesel generation, while a solar and battery only system would cut diesel by just 35 per cent.
This meant that removing wind from the equation fundamentally changed the economics of the project, which depended on repaying the loans using the savings from reduced diesel use.
Logan said Frydenberg’s intervention was based on the visual impact of the turbines on the island, despite the fact that there would be only two of them, at around half the size of the average land-based variety.
“These are unique tilt-up and tilt-down (turbines), and don’t need big cranes to install them,” Logan told One Step.
“We were about to go out to tender, we had at least two good options for turbine manufacturers who could deliver what we wanted.
“We looked at noise, we looked at infrasound, we looked at impacts on birds, visual impact,” he said. “We didn’t think they would be show-stoppers.”
But the federal Coalition’s low opinion of wind energy – and particularly of its ‘visual impact’ – is nothing new. Several of the party’s most senior ministers, and its former Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, have variously described wind farms as “utterly offensive”, “a blight on the landscape”, “hideous,” and “visually awful”.
The Lord Howe Island Board, meanwhile, has weighed up the environmental impacts of not shifting to a renewables microgrid, for an island that sits 600km off the NSW coast and depends on just 120kW of privately owned solar PV, and three 300kW diesel generators.
“With transporting diesel across the ocean and across the island, there’s the risk of spillage into the marine park and also on the island which is a World Heritage site,” Logan said in September 2015.
“So we certainly want to reduce the impact of that.”
Not to mention the economics: “Lord Howe Island is 600km off the east coast of Australia and, like other remote off-grid communities across the country, is heavily reliant on diesel generators that are costly to run and subject to volatile fuel prices,” ARENA CEO Ivor Frischknecht said in 2014, when the funding was announced.
Frischknecht said at the time that the project would transform the energy generation profile of the World Heritage site, which is home to a permanent island community as well as being an iconic Australian tourist destination.
This article was originally published on RenewEconomy’s sister site, One Step Off The Grid, which focuses on customer experience with distributed generation. To sign up to One Step’s free weekly newsletter, please click here.

This post was published on June 13, 2017 3:17 pm

View Comments

  • At school we had a term for people like Frydenberg....a 'deadmoon'.
    A waste of space and a wowser.
    As for visual impact....it is nothing compared to the massive deforestation thats occurred there.
    As for infrasound concerns... all affected people are to stay well away from the coast in case of waves dumping.

    • It is all laughable really. Thousands of wind turbines all over Europe and no one blinks an eye.

  • Harvard University have a new type of wind turbine which has a vertical column and rotating blades which are not as visually intrusive. These towers would not be as tall, less likely to sustain wind damage in extreme conditions, and cheaper than wind turbines as previously constructed. I respectfully suggest that this is worth further investigation.

    • Great for R&D but too early. There are similar in many locations around the world but also early. Saw one on UK tv installed that did not work for owner.

  • A ~$10.1m project for 350 residents plus 400 tourists is ~$13,500 per person! I'd have thought this would be enough to buy a ~90% annual solar contribution solution, with the diesel gensets only running occasionally to keep the batteries charged on days with heavy cloud for 9 months of the year with heavier usage May to July to account for less sun in winter. Don't have time to find a recent annual load but the 2010 load at powerhouse is reported as 2,311 MWh pa (LHI Energy Supply Road-Map, 2011). This is 6.33 MWh per average day. Anyone estimated how many kW of PV the rooftops of LHI could sensibly fit?

  • Typical liberal government, Its OK to drop poison on people but as far as going green energy it doesn't look good for the environment.

  • So, the government can intervene to prevent two wind turbines being built, but they want to change the law to prevent environmental concerns being taken to court to prevent a mine going ahead?
    As if we didn't already know they were in the pockets of fossil fuel industry. The actions under Turnbull are as bad as the threats under Abbott.

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Rooftop solar growth nears record levels, led by Queensland and commercial installs

For a typically slow month, April 2024 has neared record levels of new rooftop solar…

May 2, 2024

Off-grid solar and battery system “twice the size of the MCG” slashes almond farm energy bill

AGL Energy completes installation of a huge stand-alone solar and battery microgrid that will power…

May 2, 2024

Australian made solar panels now available through more than 100 retailers

Australia’s only solar panel manufacturer says its retail network has more than doubled over the…

May 1, 2024

Solar apartments: State opens offer of up to $100,000 to install shared rooftop PV

Solar for Apartments Program offers up to $100,000 to eligible bodies corporate, 50% as a…

April 29, 2024

Home electrification rebate flooded with interest as gas exodus gears up

State government-backed rebate designed to install bulk residential rooftop PV and electric hot water has…

April 29, 2024

Landlords join call for rebates to help renters and apartments get solar and go electric

People who live in apartments are less likely to benefit from solar power or efficient…

April 19, 2024