Tamworth council weighs $1m solar rollout – with a message for Barnaby

Published by

The regional New South Wales town of Tamworth – the electoral heart of climate catastrophist and $100 lamb roast scaremonger Barnaby Joyce – is weighing up plans to spend more than $1 million installing more than half a megawatt of solar on up to a dozen council-owned facilities.
Tamworth Regional Council members will vote on Tuesday night on the $1.1 million plan that, if approved, would see a total of 590kW of solar PV installed at 12 different locations.
In a report prepared for council ahead of the vote, consultants GHD detail the huge energy cost savings the council stands to make through installing the solar, putting them at a combined total of around $117,000 a year.
But the report also focuses on the added cost benefits of current federal government subsidies, including the Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme and the Large-scale Renewable Energy Target.
This is worth noting, because it looks like a message to Joyce, the former deputy prime minister, and his fellow National Party MPs who have campaigned to remove all subsidies for renewables.
It’s a desire they share with Australian Competition and Consumer Commission chairman Rod Sims, who in particular would like to wind up the rooftop solar rebate by 2021, nine years ahead of its scheduled closure, if not sooner.
As things stand, 11 of the planned solar installs on Tamworth council sites would be eligible for small-scale technology certificates (STCs) under the SRES, with planned system sizes of less than 100kW.
The twelfth, planned for the Westdale Wastewater Treatment Plant, would eligible for LGCs under the LRET at 200kW.
The report notes that the cost of the project would be reduced to $876,000 once the up-front rebate from large and small-scale technology certificates was factored in, allowing it to be paid off in little more than seven years.
In terms of the larger Westdale PV system, the council report notes that if the current LGC spot price stays at $85, the pay back period for that project could be reduced to less than four years.
With or without subsidies, however, the council report notes that a pay back period of around 10 years gives an internal Rate of Return (IRR) over the life of a solar system of around 8.5 per cent, “which is presently greater than a cash investment.”
The report notes that, with the council’s current energy contract due to expire at the end of the 2019 financial year, “a 50 per cent  increase in energy costs would see the pay back period reduced to almost six years.”
Council says that based on current market prices, an increase of at least 30 per cent is expected under a new contract for large market sites in 2019.
As well as the Westdale Water Treatment plant, other Tamworth council assets proposed for solar include the iconic Australian Country Music Hall of Fame, theTamworth Sports Dome, the local Barraba Pool, the Tamworth Library and the Dungowan Dam.
As the local paper notes, the council shift to solar would catch the local government up with to the rest of the community, where one in six households – or 17 per cent – have installed rooftop PV.
We will update this story once the result of the council vote has been published.

This post was published on September 25, 2018 2:33 pm

View Comments

  • Great news! Let's hope the Council votes to support this excellent initiative, a win/win proposal! :-)

  • Is there any other Council investment that is described by 'payback time'? As the author rightly notes "...a pay back period of around 10 years gives an internal Rate of Return (IRR) over the life of a solar system of around 8.5 per cent ..." What sounds bad (a payback time of 10 years), is actually pretty good (IRR of 8.5%)
    What is missing is some help with the term IRR which is not understood by many. However actually most of us do know it: It is a 'comparison rate' - the same as you may know from home loans. Just that in this case you are the bank.

  • Barnaby Joyce continues his love for his mate's Coal Corporations. Many Councils have invested in renewable energy which is a sensible investment. A vast difference in attitudes between the Council & Barnaby Joyce who is out of touch with voter's.

  • Barnaby Joyce gets elected and his electorate realises that RE is better than coal.
    How does this work do the people vote for 1 person but do the opposite to what he says?
    Does the electorate have an overwhelming number of people who can hold 2 different thoughts in their head and use one for life and one for their political belief?
    Or perhaps there are just enough idiots in the electorate to elect him which?

Share
Published by

Recent Posts

Rooftop solar growth nears record levels, led by Queensland and commercial installs

For a typically slow month, April 2024 has neared record levels of new rooftop solar…

May 2, 2024

Off-grid solar and battery system “twice the size of the MCG” slashes almond farm energy bill

AGL Energy completes installation of a huge stand-alone solar and battery microgrid that will power…

May 2, 2024

Australian made solar panels now available through more than 100 retailers

Australia’s only solar panel manufacturer says its retail network has more than doubled over the…

May 1, 2024

Solar apartments: State opens offer of up to $100,000 to install shared rooftop PV

Solar for Apartments Program offers up to $100,000 to eligible bodies corporate, 50% as a…

April 29, 2024

Home electrification rebate flooded with interest as gas exodus gears up

State government-backed rebate designed to install bulk residential rooftop PV and electric hot water has…

April 29, 2024

Landlords join call for rebates to help renters and apartments get solar and go electric

People who live in apartments are less likely to benefit from solar power or efficient…

April 19, 2024