To add battery storage, or not to add battery storage ….
That is the question many solar households in Australia are already asking themselves, as the winding back of solar feed-in tariffs coincides with falling battery costs and an influx of plug and play battery storage offerings to the Australian market. Not to mention soaring network costs.
Report after analyst report predicts that the battery storage market will take off in Australia over the next couple of years, led by a boom in the residential sector.
While there is an undeniable surge in interest in battery storage, the simple fact is that for most Australian households battery storage is not yet a value proposition. It may be that economics will not be the driving factor in the speed of uptake, but for many it will be.
That fact that was stressed again on Monday in a comprehensive report, released by the Alternative Technology Association, which aims to predict when, where and and for which sort of households, battery storage will stack up first.
“There’s a lot of hype in the community about battery storage, and while we think it is a great thing, we urge people to understand their own electricity consumption patterns and choose the most suitably sized and designed solar and battery systems,” said ATA policy and research manager Damian Moyse.
To do this, ATA researchers used a purpose built solar-with-battery economic feasibility tool called the Sunulator – which was launched in Melbourne on Tuesday – to analyse electricity data from 10 different locations (capital cities plus Cairns and Alice Springs), consumption data for typical working couples and young families, three different grid tariff types and different sized solar systems.
The results were mixed. For most households in Australia, the ATA found that battery storage would not make sense economically until 2020; but for some households in Sydney or Adelaide, it could be as early as 2018. It’s all about weighing up a number of key metrics –not least of all, the sort of tariff you are on.
“At today’s prices, most Australian households won’t be able to achieve a 10-year return on their investment – which is the typical lifetime of a well-designed and operated battery system,” said Moyse. “But by 2020, this will change for an increasing number of homes.”
This is illustrated in the graphs below, taken from the report:
In nine scenarios across six locations, the report found that a 4kWh battery improved the net present value (NPV) for a “Young Family” across a variety of tariffs. As you can see below, households from only two locations – Sydney and Adelaide – achieved this with investment in 2018. The remainder involved investment in 2020.
“Adding batteries did generally deliver savings over the ‘solar-only’ systems,” the report found – with annual savings
ranging from $132-$335 for a small battery and $187-$513 for a larger battery, dependent upon household type, location and grid tariff.
The study also found that the smaller 4kWh battery was always more attractive than the larger 7kWh one; and in no case did adding batteries significantly speed up the solar system payback time.
Of course, the report found that “smarter” battery systems – which could work with a given household’s time-of-use tariff to maximise both cheap energy storage and solar self generation – would deliver greater savings, especially if they incorporated weather forecasts.
“It remains to be seen when batteries this smart become available in Australia,” the report said.
The report also found that the economics of investing in storage would obviously be improved if households were paid to provide and share in associated benefits to the electricity grid.
The chart below analyses a scenario where an energy company co-invested $300 per kWh, off-setting the solar
household’s upfront costs.
ATA suggests energy companies could co-invest in such systems, for example, by selling batteries cheaply to households and, on critical days, could control the batteries remotely, discharging them at peak times.
Likewise, though, it remains to be seen when energy companies this smart will become available in Australia.
Until that time, or until batteries drop further in price, the ATA suggests households try cutting their bills through more effective investments, including LED lights; gap sealing, insulation and window shading; efficient appliances; ditching the gas network; and solar without batteries.
Here’s their data on the current payback period of solar only systems for both household types.
Finally, the report calls on Australian consumers to get to know their own energy profiles and to embrace energy efficiency. And if they want to invest in a solar-battery system, perhaps test the economic feasibility first using the ATA’s Sunulator tool.
“Different consumption levels and different lifestyles require different solutions – no one size fits all,” said Moyse.
“Having a more energy-efficient home will mean you need smaller sized batteries, which will ultimately be better for your overall energy costs and the environment,” he said.
“Batteries need to be considered in the context of an overarching, holistic energy management approach – whether that be for a household or business.”
Sophie is editor of One Step Off The Grid and deputy editor of its sister site, Renew Economy. Sophie has been writing about clean energy for more than a decade.
This post was published on November 18, 2015 8:32 am
An update on how Victoria's State Electricity Commission is rolling out their one-stop-shops for home…
In our final episode for the year, SunWiz's Warwick Johnston on the highs and the…
Regulator report finds that little-understood but increasingly common demand tariffs can add up to $800…
Have you heard the one about non-solar homes paying the cost to networks of accommodating…
Four good quality solar panels - costing around $500 - would produce enough power for…
The gas war still burns: “We need to think about how to stop misinformation going…
View Comments
Here in Queensland, as well as most other places in Oz, you also have to consider the value of going all the way off-grid.
We presently face an annual connection fee of more than $500, up from less than $100 (that's a 400% increase) in just a few years. As soon as you go off-grid you get a permanent tax free benefit of at least $500 per year. The annual value of this benefit is likely to go far higher.
You also have to consider the value of ensuring yourself against further changes to electricity tariffs. A single capital expenditure now which covers your electricity needs permanently has value which is not captured by any "pay-back" analysis.
That's true Stan. We have looked at that before:
http://www.ata.org.au/ata-research/the-economics-of-stand-alone-power-systems
Quitting the grid is still a fair way off making economic sense for most people. Costs are high, eg:
http://www.rpc.com.au/solar-systems/off-grid-solar-power/large-commercial.html
Also you'll end up wasting a lot of solar in summer; with a grid connection all generation has an environmental benefit.
Hi Andrew--Both of your criticisms are exactly right, and I agree that a grid-mediated system with lots of solar and batteries would make more sense in every way.
But the system is utterly broken for political reasons. Nothing will change until the grid is pushed to a crisis. As dumb as that is, there's no evident alternative.
Progress will come fastest if those who have the opportunity to go off-grid do so as fast as possible.
Hi - my points weren't meant as criticisms, just things to take into account, which you evidently have! :-)
Sophie. Please could you have the battery analysis (worthwhile or not....) carried out to include the use of an electric vehicle. Vehicle being charged 90% from home solar system thus no expenditure on petrol and minimal maintenance costs. I am sure everyone would like to see the difference in returns. The home battery system 15kwh + would allow vehicle top ups at any time......
Hi Paulus. Yes that would certainly improve the economics. It would be tricky to do it though, because you'd have to factor in the variability in driving habits too.
Some days the car wouldn't be able to absorb much (because you haven't driven far) and other days the car would be away from home during solar generation times.
Some of the days when the car is sitting there waiting for a charge will coincide with high household consumption and low sunlight, so there wouldn't be much excess to charge the car anyway!
If we could get some electric car charging data, we could do a supplementary simulation on this.
Please remember that there are reasons other than economic for people to leave the grid now and install battery storage NOW. When I can afford it I will do it not because of the rate of return but because it is my investment in my grandchildren's future