Earlier this week, Greenpeace International released a report predicting that the world could shift to 100 per cent renewable energy by 2050, and, more importantly, it could do so for a net economic gain – the savings from avoided fuel costs alone more than compensating for the investment necessary to build renewable generation capacity and transform grids.
The report, Greenpeace’s Energy [R]evolution scenario 2015, maps the phase-out of coal, oil, gas and nuclear energy as fast as technically and economically possible, by expanding the renewable energy share to 42 per cent in 2030, 72 per cent in 2040 and 100 per cent in 2050.
In a nutshell, the 364-page report finds there are no major economic or technical barriers to shifting the world to 100 per cent renewable energy by 2050. All we need is the political will to do it.
So where does this leave consumers? According to the Energy [R]evolution scenarios, the assumption is that – as early as 2030 – all private consumers and small and medium enterprises (SME) that can, will meet most of their electricity needs with solar PV and storage.
This is because, already, we are at a point where households and small businesses can produce their own solar power for the same or a lower cost than rates for grid electricity, says the report; “on-site power generation – a term usually used for industry – now makes economic sense for the private sector.
“Therefore, utilities will lose most of their customers connected to the distribution grid until 2030 for electricity sales from centralised power plants.”
Of course, how smoothly this transition plays out will come back down to political will; it will require the adaptation of energy policies for “prosumers” – consumers who produce their own energy.
However it plays out, the end result will be the same: that utilities will have to move from selling energy, to selling energy services, by managing the operation and dispatch of decentralised generation capacity, as well as larger-scale renewable energy generation, including solar thermal plants and wind farms.
Further, there will be stand-alone systems for heating and cooling either connected to district heating networks or for a single building supply, such as solar thermal collectors, bio-energy heat systems and (geothermal) heat pumps.
“All these decentralised technologies can be commercialised for domestic users to provide sustainable, low-carbon energy,” the report says.
Industry and business, meanwhile, can use cogeneration power plants and cogeneration batteries for on-site power generation to cover their own power needs.
“Surplus power will be sold to the grid, while excess heat can to be piped to nearby buildings, a system known as combined heat and power,” the report says.
And for interest’s sake, here’s what the grid profile of 2050 might look like…
Sophie is editor of One Step Off The Grid and deputy editor of its sister site, Renew Economy. Sophie has been writing about clean energy for more than a decade.
This post was published on September 22, 2015 11:16 pm
The gas war still burns: “We need to think about how to stop misinformation going…
IEEFA's Amandine Denis-Ryan explains why new gas supplies are not needed in the long term,…
Three simple, effective ways to stop your solar electricity going to waste.
Clean Energy Regulator issues fresh reminder to follow the rules governing the rooftop solar industry…
China giant unveils new inverter series in Australia and New Zealand, high-voltage hybrid inverter for…
A project in Melbourne that provided free energy audits and energy upgrades for private rental…
View Comments
Well I for one would feel a lot more confident in a 100% renewable regime (minus any hydro and enhanced geothermal that is) if some entrepreneur/council/green group could demonstrate the notion long before 2050. If we could set up a representative populated trial area of say 50 sq kms solely on such renewable and see 1.. If it works 24/7 and 2. the costs involved. If it worked I and many others like me would heed the call and push for the100% action.
Work is already on the way to do exactly what you are asking for.
I myself been working with a group of people to test the feasibility and then reliability of a new model for the energy sector
That's excellent news Wolfgang. As with any new concept there are bound to be problems and we must not wait decades only to find out we have overlooked something vital. Transition from a carbon world will be tough enough without discovering last minute 'road blocks'. I look forward to reading about your progress.
Regards
Mike
As you mentioned anything new will have some form of problem. It is very important to be flexible at all times and adapt.We try to get as many people involve to explore opportunities and possible problems.
Mike what is your interest in solar and have you got any experience in the field?
If you like to stay in touch feel free to contact me.
My email is wolfgang10@iprimus.com.au
Wolfgang. I have taken up your offer and replied directly thanks
There's just the war against solar to get over. If we love enough, eventually others will treat us fairly. All of us can have a green future and a vibrant economy too.