The northern NSW town of Tyalgum is considering a proposal to go 100 per cent renewable and to possibly quit the grid altogether, in what would be the first such move by a township in Australia.
Tyalgum is one of a number of towns in northern NSW and Victoria looking to become “zero emissions” towns, but the community of 120 homes and more than 250 people could be the first to actually achieve it. And in doing so, it could provide a blue-print for others to follow.
Earlier this year, Tyalgum received a small grant from the NSW government to pursue “community energy” concepts, and it commissioned consultancy group Energy for the People to do a feasibility study into their options.
That study has now been released, and presents several options and two core scenarios: looking after its own energy needs with a renewables-dominated micro-grid; or aiming for 100 per cent renewable energy but using the grid as a back-up.
Energy for the People estimate that it will only require 2.5 hectares of solar PV, and 30 square metres of battery storage, to meet those needs.
And how the likes of Essential Energy respond to the proposal will be key for the decisions made by Tyalgum and other similar communities.
While network operators in Western Australia, as we report here, are looking for tenders to take small communities off grid to save the cost of grid maintenance and upgrades, and other networks in Queensland and South Australia can see the future in renewable-based micro-grids, the idea has not really been tested.
As Szatow states clearly in the report: it’s not the technology that is the issue, that already exists. It’s the structure of the grid that counts, and how people work together. The network operator – and the pricing of its assets – will play a critical role.
Giles Parkinson is founder and editor of One Step Off The Grid, and also edits and founded Renew Economy and The Driven. He has been a journalist for 35 years and is a former business and deputy editor of the Australian Financial Review.
This post was published on September 30, 2015 8:43 am
For a typically slow month, April 2024 has neared record levels of new rooftop solar…
AGL Energy completes installation of a huge stand-alone solar and battery microgrid that will power…
Australia’s only solar panel manufacturer says its retail network has more than doubled over the…
Solar for Apartments Program offers up to $100,000 to eligible bodies corporate, 50% as a…
State government-backed rebate designed to install bulk residential rooftop PV and electric hot water has…
People who live in apartments are less likely to benefit from solar power or efficient…
View Comments
The numbers in this article make no sense to me. If there are 120 houses, 2.7MW of solar capacity would be over 22 kilowatts per house or almost 11kW per person. What are they doing up there? Smelting aluminium in the back yard?
You use curiously similar figures for storage. 2.7MWh, or almost 11kWh of storage per person.
My diagnosis: too many engineers. It looks like this system is sized to allow every resident to switch on his air con, jug, and hairdryer at midnight after a week of rain. You can spend a fortune sizing a system for the most improbable and troublesome string of events; you can achieve practical self-sufficiency at far lower cost.
Stan, In addition there is still diesel gen set back-up!
Hi Dave, see comment above. You can download the full report here - http://energyforthepeople.tyalgumenregyproject.instapage.com/
Thanks Tosh.
You may want to check the download process. It requires a name and e-mail address, then it says processing, and nothing happens, other than loading the home page. Clicking on free download there and same happens.
Hi Max, I've tried it myself and it works ok for me. It might download automatically to a folder somewhere on your computer? email me using tosh@enregyforthepeople.com.au if you still have trouble with it
Hi Stan, I authored the report and agree the article is confusing. There is also a high st running through the town, with a number of commercial premises. So the load is not purely driven by house numbers. You can download the full report here http://energyforthepeople.tyalgumenregyproject.instapage.com/
$4.7m for 100% independence replacing $700k a year in electricity costs would pay for itself in less than 7 years.
It would be longer than that, have to include interest and costs, but still under 10 years most likely.
Zero emissions town hey? So, no BBQ's, no fireplaces, no cars, no cows, no cutting down trees. What a crock of shit. The power storage batteries and solar panel arrays & wiring require some of the most polluting chemical and industrial processes used in the world. Despite all the bullshit, we need to invest / research in cleaner forms of power like Nuclear which will ultimately lead us to Fusion power. Fact : Clean energy is not scalable to major cities. So unless you support the extinction of 6 Billion human beings, maybe speak about evolving to more efficient forms of power, rather than putting us back in the dark ages again. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJXeRbuO9LM
Beg to differ, cities can go solar you just have to start thinking outside the box, instead of tying yourself to multibillion dollar single suppliers. Going from coal to nuclear is just going from the frying pan to the fire.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlTA3rnpgzU