• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
One Step Off The Grid

One Step Off The Grid

Solar, storage and distributed energy news

  • Solar
  • Battery/Storage
  • Off-Grid
  • Efficiency
  • Software
  • Podcasts
  • Tariffs
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Electrification

“Classic bait and switch:” Tesla faces class action over Solar Roof price hike

May 19, 2021 by Sophie Vorrath Leave a Comment

Tesla's

Tesla has been accused of using “classic bait and switch” sales tactics in a class action lawsuit filed against the Palo Alto company for breach of contract over the recent unexpected price hike of its integrated glass tile Solar Roof product.

As One Step reported last month, a number of US Tesla customers have reported being hit with drastic and unexpected price increases on existing Solar Roof orders – of which they were notified by email – that have added up to 50% more to the cost of installation that they originally agreed to.

The issue was addressed by Tesla co-founder and CEO Elon Musk in the company’s quarterly earnings call last month, who confirmed that the price hikes had come down to some “some significant mistakes” the company had made in assessing the degree of difficulty of installation on certain roofs.

“We did find that we basically made some significant mistakes in assessing the difficulty of certain roofs,” Musk said in response to a question around the pricing issue.

“But the complexity of roofs varies dramatically,” he added. “Some roofs can be literally two or three times easier than other roofs. So, you just can’t have a one size fits all situation.”

Not surprisingly, Musk’s typically matter-of-fact explanation does not appear to have appeased affected Solar Roof customers. Bloomberg reported on Monday that a complaint had been filed in a federal court in Northern California, suing Tesla over the unexpected price hikes and accusing it of “deceptive” and unfair sales tactics.

“After completing the sales agreements, and while the consumers have been making plans for the installations, in classic bait-and-switch fashion, Tesla is now informing these consumers they must pay upwards of a 50% price hike on the cost of the Solar Roof if they want to proceed with the installation – and if they do not pay promptly, they risk losing their place in line for installation,” the complaint said. “This is nothing short of a deceptive and unfair scheme.”

The federal case follows earlier reports from Business Insider that a Pennsylvania couple in late April had filed a lawsuit in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania claiming Tesla was in breach of its contract and had violated consumer protection acts covering home improvement and trade practices.

US legal website Top Class Actions reported that the lead plaintiffs of that case were seeking to represent other Pennsylvania consumers who alleged a similar experience with their solar roof tiles contract. They accuse Tesla of violating state consumer protection laws and want the court to assess damages on behalf of Class Members.  

“Tesla is demanding that Plaintiffs pay more than double for the Solar Roof from what was agreed-upon in the Contract,” the class action alleges. “Specifically, Defendant has increased the price of the Solar Roof from $30,139.20 to $61,255.25. Defendant has also increased the price of the Powerwall from $16,000 to $17,000.” 

Business Insider last week reported that a class-action lawsuit had been filed in a California court, last Thursday, led by a customer claiming that Tesla had increased the price of his Solar Roof quote by more than $US70,000 after he had signed contracts.

That complainant, represented by the law firm Edelson PC, has reportedly brought the suit on behalf of anyone in the US that was told their Solar Roof price was going up after having signed contracts. The exact size of the class was not yet known, BI said. It’s unclear whether this is the same federal case reported by Bloomberg.

Rather than seek compensation, the California suit reportedly aims to compel Tesla to honor its original contract and install the roof for the original agreed-upon price.

Sophie Vorrath
Sophie Vorrath

Sophie is editor of One Step Off The Grid and editor of its sister site, Renew Economy. Sophie has been writing about clean energy for more than a decade.

Filed Under: Solar, News

Primary Sidebar

Sign up for our weekly newsletter

Emissions Counter

Renew Economy

RSS Energy News from Renew Economy

  • Councils flex their muscle on renewables, laying down the local law on roads, farmland and housing
  • Network giant uses contentious new transmission line to boost regional mobile coverage
  • Fortescue adds another electric excavator, says it is saving a million litres of diesel per unit
  • The fertiliser gap is Australia’s next supply chain crisis. With low cost renewables, it doesn’t have to be
  • NZ orders networks to “buy back” rooftop solar during peaks, in suite of DER-boosting reforms

RSS Electric Vehicle News from The Driven

  • Kia announces Australian pricing for its PV5 Cargo electric van, undercuts rivals
  • Electric vehicle road fee would hit outer suburbs hardest, and could throttle record adoption
  • Video: Mazda CX-6E first look & walkthrough
  • Is Australia’s EV sales surge a one-off or a structural shift? The clue is in the order backlog
  • EV fast charging queues are back. Could a kerbside charger network help?

Press Releases

  • Huge luxury Saudi resort goes 100pct renewables with one of world’s biggest batteries
  • How solar + storage can be a game-changer for people with disabilities

Footer

Technologies

  • Solar
  • Battery/Storage
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Energy Efficiency
  • Software/Gadgets
  • Other Renewables
  • Policy
  • Tariffs
  • Contact
  • Advertise with us
  • About One Step Off The Grid
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2026 · OneStep Genesis on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in