
There is a lot of talk about the ability of battery storage to take households and businesses off the grid. Yes, they can, but it’s probably only for those not on a strict budget, or for those who are building new, and probably won’t bother connecting to the grid because of the massive costs involved.
For everyone else, it is a numbers game. And right now, as even most purveyors of quality battery storage products admit, the numbers don’t yet add up for quitting the grid and building in the necessary redundancy.
So for those of us left, and interested in battery storage as a means of saving money, how do the numbers stack up?
Before tackling those numbers, it is worth noting that the numbers for battery storage are more complex than they may first appear.
Making the economics work will depend on how much your household consumes and when, the size of your solar array, if any, and the local tariff structure. Then you have to consider how you will use that battery, and how the grid might use it to.
It’s not just the cost of the hardware that counts, but the value you can extract – either by storing electricity for your own use later in the evening, to play an arbitrage game with time of use, playing the peaks, or meeting demand charges.
Enphase Energy estimate that their are four or five lines of value that can be extracted from battery storage, but right now – because of regulatory constraints – only a few are available.
In the US, the Rocky Mountain Institute identified 13 different services that could be provided by battery storage, yet less than one quarter of the those are being exploited.
That means, RMI said, that batteries are sitting unused or underutilized for well over half of the system’s lifetime. “For example, an energy storage system dispatched solely for demand charge reduction is utilized for only 5–50% of its useful life,” it wrote in a recent report on the value of battery storage.
